Logic is quite capable of doing all that itself.
#Fl studio vs logic pro x pro#
Take it or leave it!Ĥ) If you do decide to go over to LPX there is no real reason i can think of why you would then try and use Pro Tools.
#Fl studio vs logic pro x update#
(Read the update about halfway down the page.)ģ) There is currently a beta version of a non native Crossover wrapped 'experimental' version of FL for the Mac available here.Īnd finally. seems to apply here)Ģ) Image Line have said they are working on a Native Mac version of FL but no release date has been announced as yet. FL and LPX work in very different ways and Im not sure you would truly benefit from how LPX works for your type of music. given what you have said.ġ) I wouldn't move to LPX unless you truly have a good reason to do so. 'I may receive some form of compensation, financial or otherwise, from my recommendation or link.' For example, while every DAW has a Record button that puts the app into record mode, Logic lets you configure the button in many different ways how and when to get into record mode, and by the way, there are at least five different record modes which are different for MIDI recording or audio recording.īut after all, it is a good choice to use Logic. For many operations, Logic gives you multiple ways to do that and that can be confusion at first. One key element to understand in Logic is "l ots of options". I can recommend my book " Logic Pro X - How it Works" where I spend a lot of time explaining and illustrating the special architecture and concepts in Logic (instead of telling you, press here and then click there) to get you up and running in now time. Especially Logic has some unique ways do do things (object oriented) that needs to be understood before getting frustrated and think it is complicated (another word for different!). Don't assume that DAW A works the same as DAW B because they both are DAWs. So the key is to learn the new Product B. The terminology, concepts and architecture might be different even if they achieve the same thing. audio recording) can be more difficult than starting with your first Product X, because you expect things in a specific way. Remember, we’re trying to be as objective as possible this time.Often, changing from Product A to Product B in a specific category (i.e.
We also decided to run each EQ in a flat state to avoid introducing any colour or bias into the results. We also used a stock EQ plugin from each DAW: Ableton Live’s EQ Eight, FL Studio’s Fruity Parametric EQ 2, and Logic’s Channel EQ. We employed FabFilter Pro-Q 2 and Waves F6. This time we’ll be utilizing EQ plugins rather than compression. Let’s get our white lab coats out of the closet, fire up the Bunsen burners, and head back into the lab for round two of our tests. We read them all and have taken on some of the ideas for our second round of tests. Readers helpfully made a number of suggestions on how we could improve our experiment. While there was a visual aspect to it, the subjective listening portion may have been a little too open-ended. We wanted to hear how the sound would be affected in a real world-type test. Perhaps it was the subjective nature of the experiment. Despite the conclusion, it seems that a number of you still feel that DAWs can sound different.
The article generated a lot of discussions online, which we followed closely. What we found was that despite a few, small differences here and there, the overall result was that there is no real difference. We loaded the same samples into three popular DAWs-Ableton Live, FL Studio Pro, and Logic Pro X-and compared the sound when run through a number of different compressors, both third party and native.
Do DAWs indeed have their own, unique sound? Would the same song sound different depending on the DAW used? In part one of this series, we hoped to answer these questions. In part two of our series, we continue to examine whether there are discernible differences in the sound of three popular DAWs, Ableton Live, FL Studio 20, and Logic Pro X.